Advanced search  

News:

cpg1.5.48 Security release - upgrade mandatory!
The Coppermine development team is releasing a security update for Coppermine in order to counter a recently discovered vulnerability. It is important that all users who run version cpg1.5.46 or older update to this latest version as soon as possible.
[more]

Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: SMF 1.x Bridge - Additional Groups Ignored  (Read 4746 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

pftq

  • Contributor
  • Coppermine frequent poster
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 111
SMF 1.x Bridge - Additional Groups Ignored
« on: September 21, 2010, 06:55:25 am »

A member with "Administrator" under their SMF Additional Groups is not given Admin permissions for Coppermine as well.

This is with CPG 1.5.8:
www.pftq.com/gallery/

I remember in 1.4.x, additional groups worked fine in CPG.
Logged

Αndré

  • Administrator
  • Coppermine addict
  • *****
  • Country: de
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 15764
Re: SMF 1.x Bridge - Additional Groups Ignored
« Reply #1 on: September 27, 2010, 10:29:28 am »

Works fine for me with latest development release (r7936).
Logged

pftq

  • Contributor
  • Coppermine frequent poster
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 111
Re: SMF 1.x Bridge - Additional Groups Ignored
« Reply #2 on: September 27, 2010, 10:58:23 am »

Is that the same as 1.5.8 (Stable)? The main issue I am getting is that someone with "Administrator" under Additional Groups (but not as their main group) will not get the option to show/hide Admin Controls.
Logged

Αndré

  • Administrator
  • Coppermine addict
  • *****
  • Country: de
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 15764
Re: SMF 1.x Bridge - Additional Groups Ignored
« Reply #3 on: September 27, 2010, 11:08:08 am »

Is that the same as 1.5.8 (Stable)?
No. But the bridge file hasn't been touched since the release of cpg1.5.8.

I just recognized the little word 'additional' in your description. Afaik Coppermine always uses the lowest permission if a user is in multiple groups. So you'll have to put him in the Administrator group if he should have administration privileges.
Logged

pftq

  • Contributor
  • Coppermine frequent poster
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 111
Re: SMF 1.x Bridge - Additional Groups Ignored
« Reply #4 on: September 27, 2010, 11:33:49 am »

I see - thanks for clarifying.

Is there any possibility this might be changed to recognize the highest permission given instead?

What I'm basically trying to do is have a user with Admin permissions but without the group name explicitly being "Administrator".
Logged

Αndré

  • Administrator
  • Coppermine addict
  • *****
  • Country: de
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 15764
Re: SMF 1.x Bridge - Additional Groups Ignored
« Reply #5 on: September 27, 2010, 11:39:28 am »

Is there any possibility this might be changed to recognize the highest permission given instead?
Moving to appropriate support board.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 20 queries.