I have searched the forum for an answer to my problem. I've found postings, like this, where people seemed to have the same difficulty that I'm now experiencing --- but no answers (at least none that I could find) to how the problem was cleared.
Our Coppermine gallery is at
www.bark.chWe tend to batch upload images --- ones that have already been keyworded with other software. When I uploaded a batch of about 40 images last night into the Australia folder, I found that some of the images did not have the mid-size (intermediate) image available. When I click on the thumbnail I get the "Internet Explorer cannot display the webpage" error message. This seems to apply to the same photographs, but not all of the uploaded images.
If you go, for example, to
http://www.bark.ch/thumbnails.php?album=70 and click on the second image in the top row (my brother in law looking like a hood ornament) you'll hopefully see what I mean. The images to the left and the right of this photo work fine, and they were uploaded as part of the same batch.
As this was only happening to certain images, and always the same images, I thought there must be something "wrong" the images themselves. I looked at them carefully (file names, keywords, etc.) but couldn't see anything different or unusual with the problematic images.
And the mid-size (intermediate) file was created on the server at the time of the upload/publish.
As the problem seemed to be with the Australian album, I deleted the entire album, and re-uploaded the images. I am having the same problem with the same images, but now having problems with some of the earlier photos uploaded into this album. Images that weren't problematical before.
As we have just crossed the 13,000 image mark, I was wondering if this problem could relate to maximum size of the database, etc. I did a forum search on that topic as well, but most of the technical issues went over my head.
We run Coppermine on a dedicated, and managed, Linux server. There is plenty of "room" on the server, and we have no restriction on bandwidth: at least none that we're likely to encounter. I have asked the server people to please look into this and to please let me know if they can figure anything out.
Any suggestions would be most appreciated. Thank you for your help.