Advanced search  

News:

cpg1.5.48 Security release - upgrade mandatory!
The Coppermine development team is releasing a security update for Coppermine in order to counter a recently discovered vulnerability. It is important that all users who run version cpg1.5.46 or older update to this latest version as soon as possible.
[more]

Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: phpBB 2.0.22 failed bridging with 1.4.12  (Read 4630 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Scias

  • Coppermine regular visitor
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 86
phpBB 2.0.22 failed bridging with 1.4.12
« on: July 15, 2007, 04:04:19 am »

hiya all, i just realized this feature was available (durr lol), i decided to go try it, unfortunatly, when i do it, the gallery will work fine and all, then when u click on the forums, it shows a distorted dead version of the forums, and 1 time, i got it to work, it would show a error upon login, and block you out totally, including via the gallery.

now im curious am i going to have to completly remove the phpbb, and fresh install it untouched, then bridge it? or what...? i tryed few times and yes, my "values" put in are correct to a dot :)

ty again.
Logged

Scias

  • Coppermine regular visitor
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 86
Re: phpBB 2.0.22 failed bridging with 1.4.12
« Reply #1 on: July 15, 2007, 04:08:13 am »

small note, i did not follow "protocol" as i cannot give out the url's directly here, as both are under construction, and not open to public, and their are a handful of users out to find these pages, and COULD trace them to here, and find them hehe :P so i have to be over-paranoid.
Logged

Nibbler

  • Guest
Re: phpBB 2.0.22 failed bridging with 1.4.12
« Reply #2 on: July 15, 2007, 04:20:42 am »

Bridging does not affect your forum - if it does then you did it wrong. You can disable the bridge by going back to bridgemgr.php and entering your original Coppermine admin details.
Logged

Scias

  • Coppermine regular visitor
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 86
Re: phpBB 2.0.22 failed bridging with 1.4.12
« Reply #3 on: July 15, 2007, 04:22:49 am »

yes sir, i understand the failsafe (thank god you guys added it hehe), so it's not the forum affecting it... maybe the custom theme on the forums could be?
Logged

Nibbler

  • Guest
Re: phpBB 2.0.22 failed bridging with 1.4.12
« Reply #4 on: July 15, 2007, 04:30:50 am »

Not possible. Coppermine loads the config.php from the forum and then accesses its database. That's all the interaction there is, themes are not involved.
Logged

Scias

  • Coppermine regular visitor
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 86
Re: phpBB 2.0.22 failed bridging with 1.4.12
« Reply #5 on: July 15, 2007, 04:42:01 am »

hm. im stumped badly now :P maybe it's my config of it after all... maybe the cookies? let me go set it up again, and compare what i get here.
Logged

Scias

  • Coppermine regular visitor
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 86
Re: phpBB 2.0.22 failed bridging with 1.4.12
« Reply #6 on: July 15, 2007, 05:02:57 am »

/phpBB2/index.php/login.php?redirect=../../cpg1412/ is what u get via login from the gallery, then it takes you to a red-link-pic, no themed forum.... haha, i think im doing some wrong here? :P
Logged

Nibbler

  • Guest
Re: phpBB 2.0.22 failed bridging with 1.4.12
« Reply #7 on: July 15, 2007, 05:09:05 am »

Yeah, you should not have index.php at the end of your 'Forum URL' in the bridge manager.

Full URL of your BBS app (including the leading http:// bit, e.g. http://www.yourdomain.tld/forum)
Logged

Scias

  • Coppermine regular visitor
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 86
Re: phpBB 2.0.22 failed bridging with 1.4.12
« Reply #8 on: July 15, 2007, 05:15:01 am »

sigh... now when i try to remove the failed bridging, it says "login" so i use my user/pass, and it says it's wrong! *beep* >_<
Logged

Joachim Müller

  • Dev Team member
  • Coppermine addict
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 47843
  • aka "GauGau"
    • gaugau.de
Re: phpBB 2.0.22 failed bridging with 1.4.12
« Reply #9 on: July 15, 2007, 12:08:17 pm »

small note, i did not follow "protocol" as i cannot give out the url's directly here, as both are under construction, and not open to public, and their are a handful of users out to find these pages, and COULD trace them to here, and find them hehe :P so i have to be over-paranoid.
I can see no reason for paranoia. Security by obscurity is nonsense. Do as suggested in the sticky thread on this board.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.015 seconds with 15 queries.