Advanced search  

News:

CPG Release 1.6.26
Correct PHP8.2 issues with user and language managers.
Additional fixes for PHP 8.2
Correct PHP8 error with SMF 2.0 bridge.
Correct IPTC supplimental category parsing.
Download and info HERE

Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: standalone vs CPGNuke  (Read 4151 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

MonkeyManx

  • Coppermine novice
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 45
standalone vs CPGNuke
« on: March 17, 2005, 06:36:43 pm »

I recently changed from standalone CPG to Dragonfly. and I gotta say. I like the standalone a lot better. If only the standalone came with a news manager, and maybe even polls.
Logged

Tranz

  • Dev Team member
  • Coppermine addict
  • ****
  • Country: 00
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 6149
Re: standalone vs CPGNuke
« Reply #1 on: March 17, 2005, 06:44:39 pm »

Could you please provide some specific feedback? It would be useful for undecided users, and developers of both teams.

What are you looking for in news management?

News manager and polls could probably be accomplished via plugins for v 1.4.
Logged

MonkeyManx

  • Coppermine novice
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 45
Re: standalone vs CPGNuke
« Reply #2 on: March 17, 2005, 07:04:30 pm »

Just a simple news script would be great. Maybe if you could configure how many articles to show on the main page. And maybe have a special user group who could post news and modify the polls. It would be nice if it showed who posted the news ect.
I tried bridging a simple news script to nuke (as far as user logins) but I couldnt get it to work.

To me, Nuke is a little over-kill for my site. The features it comes packed with are nice, but not worth the fustration of bridging standalone to nuked. (btw i couldnt figure out how to do it).
I feel kinda like a php-failure.
Logged

Tranz

  • Dev Team member
  • Coppermine addict
  • ****
  • Country: 00
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 6149
Re: standalone vs CPGNuke
« Reply #3 on: March 17, 2005, 07:13:33 pm »

Maybe something like minicms for news management? http://cpg-contrib.org/index.php?file=minicms/cms&id=11

In its current state, it doesn't have the features you want. However, they are on the road map.

There are some poll scripts released under GPL. Someone could probably make a plugin to incorporate them into coppermine.
Logged

MonkeyManx

  • Coppermine novice
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 45
Re: standalone vs CPGNuke
« Reply #4 on: March 17, 2005, 07:17:40 pm »

Can miniCMS be installed on 1.3? Does it reset all the users? Where can I download it?
Logged

Tranz

  • Dev Team member
  • Coppermine addict
  • ****
  • Country: 00
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 6149
Re: standalone vs CPGNuke
« Reply #5 on: March 17, 2005, 07:20:13 pm »

It cannot be used with 1.3. It can't even be used with earlier versions of 1.4. You would have to install the latest version of 1.4 from CVS but it is still in beta, so you must go to the 1.4 board and read more on how to get 1.4 and the caveats.
Logged

MonkeyManx

  • Coppermine novice
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 45
Re: standalone vs CPGNuke
« Reply #6 on: March 18, 2005, 10:05:26 am »

I kind of decided that I would like my users to be able to add links aswell. I am tinking that I should bridge e107 and CPG 1.3. Do you think that is a good combo, cuz I tried the 1.4 and the no support on that is killing me cuz I cant get the album list page to work.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 20 queries.