Advanced search  

News:

cpg1.5.24 maintenance release - upgrade recommended
The Coppermine development team is releasing an update for Coppermine in order to fix several minor issues. All fixes are not security critical, so if your gallery is running fine with cpg1.5.20 or cpg1.5.22 you don't need to upgrade. If you are running an older version than cpg1.5.20, you must update to this latest version as soon as possible because of the security impact!
[more]

Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: SMF 1.x Bridge - Additional Groups Ignored  (Read 1687 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

pftq

  • Contributor
  • Coppermine frequent poster
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 111
SMF 1.x Bridge - Additional Groups Ignored
« on: September 21, 2010, 06:55:25 am »

A member with "Administrator" under their SMF Additional Groups is not given Admin permissions for Coppermine as well.

This is with CPG 1.5.8:
www.pftq.com/gallery/

I remember in 1.4.x, additional groups worked fine in CPG.
Logged

Αndré

  • Administrator
  • Coppermine addict
  • *****
  • Country: de
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 11835
Re: SMF 1.x Bridge - Additional Groups Ignored
« Reply #1 on: September 27, 2010, 10:29:28 am »

Works fine for me with latest development release (r7936).
Logged

pftq

  • Contributor
  • Coppermine frequent poster
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 111
Re: SMF 1.x Bridge - Additional Groups Ignored
« Reply #2 on: September 27, 2010, 10:58:23 am »

Is that the same as 1.5.8 (Stable)? The main issue I am getting is that someone with "Administrator" under Additional Groups (but not as their main group) will not get the option to show/hide Admin Controls.
Logged

Αndré

  • Administrator
  • Coppermine addict
  • *****
  • Country: de
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 11835
Re: SMF 1.x Bridge - Additional Groups Ignored
« Reply #3 on: September 27, 2010, 11:08:08 am »

Is that the same as 1.5.8 (Stable)?
No. But the bridge file hasn't been touched since the release of cpg1.5.8.

I just recognized the little word 'additional' in your description. Afaik Coppermine always uses the lowest permission if a user is in multiple groups. So you'll have to put him in the Administrator group if he should have administration privileges.
Logged

pftq

  • Contributor
  • Coppermine frequent poster
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 111
Re: SMF 1.x Bridge - Additional Groups Ignored
« Reply #4 on: September 27, 2010, 11:33:49 am »

I see - thanks for clarifying.

Is there any possibility this might be changed to recognize the highest permission given instead?

What I'm basically trying to do is have a user with Admin permissions but without the group name explicitly being "Administrator".
Logged

Αndré

  • Administrator
  • Coppermine addict
  • *****
  • Country: de
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 11835
Re: SMF 1.x Bridge - Additional Groups Ignored
« Reply #5 on: September 27, 2010, 11:39:28 am »

Is there any possibility this might be changed to recognize the highest permission given instead?
Moving to appropriate support board.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.171 seconds with 21 queries.